About Us | Advertise | RSS | Tue, Jul 16 ē 06:35

  • Uebelhor
arrow Back

Response to Mr. Kelly Roggenkamp

Dear Editor:

In response to Kelly Roggenkampís letter to the editor recently, I was surprised by his claim that Congressman Baron Hill should tell locals where to place a biomass plant, but be against the Energy Bill that passed the House of Representatives at the end of July. The debate on the biomass plant notwithstanding, itís time for the truth to be told about the Energy Bill and there were several factual errors in his letter.

Letís get this clear - the Energy Bill is about protecting our national security and creating jobs. We, as Americans, are tired of exporting over $700 billion each year to a Saudi Prince or al Qaeda terrorists. This bill, instead, is predicted to create over 38,000 jobs in Indiana in an economic sector growing 2.5 times the rate of traditional jobs over the past ten years.

Mr. Roggenkampís is correct only in that the original version was unworkable for Indiana. But, it was Congressman Baron Hill that fought to add provisions which make the bill passed by the House attainable for Hoosiers. Mr. Hillís biggest concern was indeed the impact the legislation had on electric consumers and fears that the bill would cause a burdensome spike in rates.

Mr. Hill fought for lowering the renewable energy standard to an attainable level and allocating 90% of emission allowances to regulated entities like utility companies. This is a big departure from the original bill, which called for an auctioning of allowances and would have raised rates.

Mr. Hill also fought for a waste-to-energy provision as a source to reach the renewable energy standard, something that should interest Mr. Roggenkampís and his support of biomass facilities. A long- time supporter of clean coal technology, Mr. Hill ensured that the bill included incentives for new technology, such as carbon capture, so that Indiana can continue to safely use fuel sources like coal and become a leader in the industry.

The assertion that the bill is a tax: think again. Several independent reviews of the legislation, have found that the impact would be negligible, and eventually completely offset by cost-saving implements.

Letís also stop thinking that Mr. Hill is the only supporter of the measure. More than 22,000 small business owners delivered a petition to Congress calling for action on this issue and the list of other supporters includes companies such as Alcoa, Caterpillar, John Deere, Duke Energy, Ford, General Electric, PepsiCo, Shell and Siemens. Even religious groups such as the Conference of Catholic Bishops, the United Methodist Church, and the Evangelical Lutheran Church support it.

Letís stop pretending the boogieman is out to get us and recognize that Mr. Hill is doing just what we sent him to Washington to do Ė serve as an independent voice for his constituents!

Dennis O. Roudenbush

Georgetown Township

Dennis O. Roudenbush
July 17, 2009

Letter Search
Barbara Shaw
Schuler Bauer
07 - 16 - 19

Corydon Instant Print
Veterans section